The increase in inventory was driven primarily by the following factors. For more information on nearby Port St. Because the court's error affected its findings with regard to the other preliminary injunction factors, we vacate the court's denial of Reebok's motion for a preliminary injunction and remand the case to the court for reconsideration of the motion.
The team has done a terrific job of creating an innovative technically superior product line. Someone bears the risks of personal injury. You can count on us to always do what's in your best interest.
This higher level of investment is driven predominately by our new distribution center initiative. As we have previously noted, this court is precluded from doing so.
Koprivica did not personally evaluate McCready, he based his assessment on her subjective complaints and her medical records. Thus, the district court erred by failing to "consider the ornamental aspects of the design as a whole and not merely isolated portions of the patented design.
If we did that, McCready would receive no benefits for permanent partial general disability.
I don't know what happened. Each donated dollar results in one planted tree in the Atlantic Forest. Receive free daily summaries of new opinions from the U. Because the majority found that the September fall arose out of and in the course of employment, the majority then examined whether that fall caused McCready's low back and right hip injuries.
Reebok contends that the district court erred in finding that Reebok did not show a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits of its design patent infringement claim.
The increase was primarily driven by higher payroll, last years antitrust settlement and the Stride Rite integration planning costs, principally professional services. McCready left work to visit Dr. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales was We envision opportunities to grow the Stride Rite business by extending the duration of customer relationship.
As an appellate court, we limit our review of questions of fact in a workers compensation case to whether the Board's findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence.Defendant Payless ShoeSource, Inc. (Payless) ceased operations at a shopping center owned by plaintiff El Centro Mall, LLC (ECM) before the end of its lease term.
Per a lease provision, ECM charged Payless liquidated damages of 10 cents per square foot of leased space for each day Payless did not operate, totaling $98, Here are the best matches of local listings based on your Incpages search.
PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS GENERAL Payless ShoeSource, Inc. ("Payless" or the "Company" or the "Registrant") is the largest family footwear retailer in the United States with more than $ billion in sales in The Company sold approximately million pairs of shoes inand served more than million customers.
Greater Kansas City Profile.
The Kansas City Area Development Council (KCADC) is your single point of contact for doing business in the Kansas City region.
united states bankruptcy court eastern district of missouri eastern division in re) case no. ) chapter Find the latest business news on Wall Street, jobs and the economy, the housing market, personal finance and money investments and much more on ABC News.Download